• Home
  • News
  • ASI Rejects Twitter User's 'misleading' Tweets On Konark Temple Restoration

ASI Rejects Twitter User's 'misleading' Tweets On Konark Temple Restoration

By: Pinki Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:55:00

ASI rejects Twitter user's 'misleading' tweets on Konark Temple restoration

The Konark Sun Temple in Odisha recently broke free of the iron scaffolding surrounding it after a rather lengthy restoration process. However, soon after it was unveiled, Twitter erupted in a controversy over the repair work.

A Twitter user on Monday took the to the micro-blogging site to wonder if restoration work at the temple had resulted in sculptures and motifs being replaces with plain stones.

Taking to Twitter with two comparative photos, the user (Anushka) said, "Kalapahad's soul must be satisfied today. We did it. We fulfilled his dream of breaking Konark."

"Konark then" and "Konark now" she captioned the two photos.

In a follow-up post she added that "almost each and every wall is restored like this".

The Konark Sun Temple in Odisha recently broke free of the iron scaffolding surrounding it after a rather lengthy restoration process.

Following the posts, people on the social media site took umbrage, with many calling for a clarification from the Archaeological Survey of India.

As one Twitter user put it, "If true, this is criminal destruction. Can somebody please double check on this right away? This is of the utmost importance. This art belongs to the world."

"Kalapahad or Kala Pahar was a Muslim General of Bengal Sultanate under the reigning Karrani Dynasty, who is mentioned in the Mughal Empire records as the one who attacked Jagannath Puri with his army to tear down the Konark temple. Seems like ASI has indeed fulfilled his dream," wrote another user.

The Archaeological Survey of India however has rejected the post, and that of others as being "false and misleading".

"The 2 images shown in the tweet are from different locations. The image with sculptures is from Natya Mandapa while the plain stones images are from the plinth of Jagmohana (the main temple)." the organisation wrote.

They followed that up with another post: "The plain stone work shown in the image was done in mid1980s. ASI used plain stone only wherein there was no evidence left & as per ASI’s the then archaeological policy only such portions were filled with plain stones. ASI would like to confirm that no sculpture has been replaced."

About Us | Contact | Disclaimer| Privacy Policy

| | |

Copyright © 2024 lifeberrys.com