Public Outrage In Assam Ahead Of PM Modi’s Namrup Visit, Allegations Of Administrative High-handedness And Damage To Farmers’ Crops

As Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s scheduled visit to Namrup in Assam draws closer, the region is witnessing a surge of public resentment fuelled by serious accusations against the local administration. Residents and farmers have voiced strong objections, alleging that official actions taken in the name of event preparedness have caused irreparable damage to standing paddy crops, triggering widespread outrage and anxiety across nearby villages.

According to villagers, administrative authorities allegedly allowed truckloads of stones, sand, and construction material to be dumped directly onto fertile agricultural land. These fields, they claim, were full of mature paddy crops just weeks away from harvest. What was meant to be routine groundwork for a high-profile political visit has, in their view, turned into a devastating blow for families who rely entirely on these crops for their livelihood.

Farmers say the destruction of their fields has pushed them to the brink of financial distress. For many households, the damaged paddy fields represent their only source of income for the year. The alleged negligence has therefore not only ruined crops but has also threatened food security and economic stability for several families, transforming a single administrative decision into a broader humanitarian concern.

Fueling public anger further, a video capturing the aftermath of the incident has spread rapidly across social media platforms. The footage shows an elderly woman, believed to be the landowner, confronting officials at the site. Visibly shaken and enraged, she questions their actions in an emotional outcry, asking whether those responsible were “human beings or demons.” Her words, filled with pain and disbelief, have struck a chord with viewers across Assam and beyond.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by The Assam Enquiry (@the.assam_enquiry)

The viral clip has intensified scrutiny of the administration’s conduct, with many netizens expressing solidarity with the affected farmers. Civil society organisations, farmer unions, and opposition leaders have since joined the chorus of criticism, condemning what they describe as a blatant disregard for rural livelihoods. They argue that the pursuit of flawless optics and VIP arrangements should not come at the cost of farmers’ survival.

Opposition figures have accused the authorities of prioritising political spectacle over human welfare, stating that such actions reflect a disturbing insensitivity toward agrarian communities. Farmer groups have echoed these sentiments, asserting that development and security measures must be planned responsibly, without trampling on the rights and resources of those who depend on the land.

In response to the incident, various organisations have demanded an immediate and transparent investigation into the matter. They are calling for strict accountability for officials found responsible, along with adequate and timely compensation for farmers whose crops were destroyed. Many have also urged the government to engage directly with affected families to restore trust and prevent similar incidents in the future.

The controversy has reignited a wider discussion on governance, administrative accountability, and the human cost associated with high-profile political events. Critics argue that while such visits are often projected as symbols of progress and development, they can expose deep fault lines when local realities are ignored or overridden.

As Assam prepares to host the Prime Minister, public attention remains firmly fixed on how the administration will respond to the allegations. Whether through silence, clarification, or corrective action, the official stance in the coming days is expected to shape public perception and determine the political fallout of the episode.

For many observers, the Namrup incident has come to symbolise a larger struggle—between authority and accountability, spectacle and sustenance, administrative convenience and agrarian justice. It stands as a stark reminder that development narratives ring hollow when they overlook the lives and livelihoods of the people most closely tied to the land.